Similarities between (Girls and Windows) and (Boys and Linux)




Similarities between (Girls and Windows) and (Boys and Linux)


Girls and Windows:

Both have a great UI.
Both consume large resources and do less work.
Both crash unexpectedly.
Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment) .
Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment) .
Both are costly to maintain.
Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
Both's working often contradicts with their documentation.
Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.

Boys and Linux:

Both have an average UI.
Both are robust.
Both are highly secure.
Both can be easily modified to support new concepts/features.
Both are highly efficient.
Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.
You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature).
Both provide large support for development (work environment) .
Both are poorly documented.


Comments

Author: Abhishek Arya21 May 2008 Member Level: Gold   Points : 2

But still we like Windows :)

Author: karthik24 May 2008 Member Level: Gold   Points : 2

ok

Author: Alok Kumar Mohanty24 May 2008 Member Level: Silver   Points : 2

Good comparison. But still windows are preferred.

Author: Biju24 May 2008 Member Level: Gold   Points : 2

Ya its very good jokes, any way windows is good



  • Do not include your name, "with regards" etc in the comment. Write detailed comment, relevant to the topic.
  • No HTML formatting and links to other web sites are allowed.
  • This is a strictly moderated site. Absolutely no spam allowed.
  • Name:
    Email: